https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49795 Wed 31 May 2023 15:25:08 AEST ]]> Probability of major depression classification based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews: A synthesis of three individual participant data meta-analyses https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50028 Wed 28 Jun 2023 09:49:40 AEST ]]> Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:38957 Wed 16 Mar 2022 14:12:17 AEDT ]]> Comparison of the Accuracy of the 7-Item HADS Depression Subscale and 14-Item Total HADS for Screening for Major Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51028 Wed 16 Aug 2023 10:09:34 AEST ]]> Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta-analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49889 Wed 14 Jun 2023 17:31:45 AEST ]]> Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:38673 N = 27). At cutoff 10, the PHQ-8 was less sensitive by 0.02 (−0.06 to 0.00) and more specific by 0.01 (0.00 to 0.01) among those studies (N = 27), with similar results for studies that used other types of interviews (N = 27). For all 54 primary studies combined, across all cutoffs, the PHQ-8 was less sensitive than the PHQ-9 by 0.00 to 0.05 (0.03 at cutoff 10), and specificity was within 0.01 for all cutoffs (0.00 to 0.01). Conclusions: PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 total scores were similar. Sensitivity may be minimally reduced with the PHQ-8, but specificity is similar.]]> Fri 22 Apr 2022 15:27:36 AEST ]]>